Tomorrow, the Supreme Court turns from a new school prayer controversy in the first hearing of the day, to a second potentially deeply divisive controversy – a major dispute over the death penalty. Frustrated for years that the process of capital punishment stretches out for years and years, the Court is more or less continually… Read More
Prayer in public schools — again
The Supreme Court on Monday reopens two long-running controversies, core constitutional disputes that always divide the Court – and, in fact, divide the entire nation. The first case being heard is about prayer at public schools, with the prospect that some of the Court’s longest-standing precedents on that issue are at risk of being overturned. … Read More
A new look at Miranda rights
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court will explore an issue that has lingered unanswered for decades: should it hold police accountable for failure to give “Miranda warnings” to suspects they want to question? That’s the topic of the only hearing tomorrow. The “live” audio (no video) will be broadcast on the Quick Links on the Supreme… Read More
Closed cases, errors and corrections
The Supreme Court continues its hearings on Tuesday with two cases that grew out of legal mistakes, requiring the Justices to consider how to remedy those missteps. One involves an error by a federal agency on veterans’ benefits, the other by a federal court in a criminal case. Correction of legal errors, although generally desirable,… Read More
Two tests of the Constitution
The Supreme Court returns to the bench tomorrow, to begin the final round of hearings in its current term. Both cases on Monday have deep historic roots – the first in an 1819 ruling by the Court on state-federal relations, the second in the original Constitution and its clause dealing with the plight of people… Read More
Now, it’s Justice-designate Jackson
At mid-afternoon Thursday, Ketanji Brown Jackson, a 51-year-old federal circuit judge, became “Justice-designate” Jackson when the Senate voted 53-47 to confirm her for the seat. She will actually become a Justice, however, only this summer, perhaps in early July, because there will be no vacant seat for her to fill until then. She was chosen… Read More
“War crimes” — What are they?
Daniel Thurer, a Swiss jurist and scholar of international law at the University of Zurich, wrote in a 2011 book: “Wars have always been fought in accordance with certain norms. It is one of the astonishing facts of history that, to a great extent, wars were not chaotic affairs – despite outward appearances to the… Read More
California versus the Supreme Court?
On Wednesday, for the fourth time in two weeks, the Supreme Court again explores the dispute-settling mechanism of arbitration. In any group of cases about that, it is likely that California will be involved in at least one of them. The state has a history of acting on its firm belief that, if there is… Read More
What does the Eleventh Amendment mean?
The Supreme Court turns on Tuesday to the meaning of a constitutional amendment added 227 years ago, the Eleventh Amendment. Ratified in 1795, it was the first change in the Constitution after the Bill of Rights, and marked the first time that a Supreme Court decision was overturned by a constitutional amendment. It comes up… Read More
The Court, words and meanings
The Supreme Court continues its current round of hearings on Monday with a pair of cases on down-to-earth issues of how law affects workers who toil at blue-collar jobs. Both cases turn on seemingly mundane questions of law: is a railroad train being used when a worker is injured on it while it is temporarily… Read More