In a ruling that is going to be tested, and soon, in the Supreme Court, a federal appeals court in Richmond, VA, on Thursday barred the Trump Administration from enforcing the President’s revised curb on immigration of foreign nationals from six Muslim-majority nations. That order, the majority said, “drips with religious intolerance, animus and discrimination,”… Read More
A rite of passage for “G.G.” — now Gavin Grimm
Gavin Grimm, the Virginia youth who has been praised by federal judges for his maturity in pursuing his legal claims as a transgender boy, has now officially become the master of his case. He reached age 18 earlier this month, so two federal courts have now changed his ongoing case title. Now it is Gavin Grimm… Read More
Wisconsin seeks delay in partisan gerrymander ruling
State officials in Wisconsin asked the Supreme Court on Monday to put on hold a federal court ruling that fashioned a new test for judging the constitutionality of partisan gerrymandering – the drawing of election districts specifically to favor one party’s candidates over the other’s. The case of Gill v. Whitford is one of the… Read More
Court puts new limits on racial gerrymandering
State legislatures may not move more black voters into an election district to give them a majority if they already make alliances with white voters that allow them to get their preferred candidates elected, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously on Monday. The federal Voting Acts does not require a “racial gerrymander” of that kind, and… Read More
Trump lawyers miss key court deadline in immigration case
Lawyers for the Trump Administration missed a court-ordered deadline for turning over a document that gave President Trump a way to justify his immigration restrictions without aiming them specifically at Muslims. The document is said to be a paper prepared by former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani at Donald Trump’s request. Friday was the… Read More
Judge finds new legal protection for transgender people
For the first time, a federal disability rights law has been interpreted to give legal protection to transgender people against discrimination. A Pennsylvania judge did so by giving a narrow reading to a phrase in that law that says it does not apply to individuals with “gender identity disorders.” U.S. District Judge Joseph F. Leeson,… Read More
States seek to protect health care subsidies
A group of 15 states plus Washington, D.C., moved on Thursday to try to head off what they called a “death spiral” for the health insurance law still in operation from the Obama Administration. They filed court papers to defend billions of dollars in subsidies that continue to be paid to health insurance companies to… Read More
Is there a narrower way to rule on immigration limits?
In the second appeals court hearing in a week on President Trump’s order seeking to limit immigration from the Mideast, the search went on again among judges on Monday for a way to decide the controversy narrowly. Just as judges in Richmond, VA, a week ago seemed somewhat anxious about making a sweeping constitutional decision… Read More
Court bypasses major test on voting rights
With Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., cautioning lower courts and lawyers not to read much into it, the Supreme Court on Monday turned aside an attempt to revive one of the nation’s strictest sets of voting restrictions, including a photo ID requirement. A federal appeals court had struck down the 2013 North Carolina state… Read More
Trump lawyers’ self-created legal dilemma
Justice Department lawyers seeking to defend President Trump restrictions on immigration have created an awkward dilemma for themselves. The difficulty of that position is now playing out in the Detroit federal courtroom of District Judge Victoria A, Roberts, because it could force the government to hand over documents that help prove that the immigration policy… Read More