Returning to the same south Texas courthouse where a Texas-led coalition won a sweeping victory against a key immigration policy of the Obama Administration more than three years ago, Texas and some of its former allies moved on Tuesday to scuttle the last remaining part of that policy – the so-called “DACA” program. The new… Read More
Key issue on immigration: Is the “ban” really a ban?
In a period of about 20 weeks, a total of 430 travelers have been allowed to enter the U.S. from the Muslim nations on the terrorist risk list that the Trump Administration created under his strict immigration policy. And one nation was recently dropped off of that list. The Supreme Court explored on Wednesday whether… Read More
Passing the buck on Internet shopping taxes?
Sometimes, the Supreme Court’s ultimate power to define what the Constitution means seems just too daunting for the Justices. That was the sentiment that swept across the bench Tuesday, as the Court confronted – after years of refusing to do so – the question of whether to allow states broad new freedom to tax shopping… Read More
Constitutional milestone on transgender rights
For the first time in any court, a federal judge in Seattle has ruled that transgender people are entitled to the fullest protection of the Constitution against discrimination. U.S. District Judge Marsha J. Pechman issued that ruling Friday in a case involving President Trump’s move to bar almost all transgender individuals from serving in the… Read More
Now, a two-front legal war over teen abortions
The Supreme Court and a federal appeals court are now moving simultaneously to sort out a major constitutional controversy over a right to abortion for undocumented teenaged girls being held in federal immigration centers and who are now or will become pregnant. After more than five months of giving some thought – off and on… Read More
Delaying ruling on partisan gerrymanders? Pros and Cons
For more than three decades, some members of the Supreme Court have thought the courts should do something to rein in the centuries-old practice of partisan gerrymandering – that is, drawing election districts to give one party’s candidates a clear advantage. But none of the Justices have thought they knew what to do about it…. Read More
Judge’s new ruling favors teens’ abortion rights
Acting in the face of the reality that the Supreme Court might soon take away her power to act, a federal judge in Washington, D.C., on Friday ordered the Trump Administration to stop interfering with the right of pregnant teenagers being held in immigration detention centers to make their own decisions whether to seek an… Read More
If an “extreme” gerrymander is invalid, what then?
A successful and deliberate effort by Maryland’s Democratic leaders to take a congressional seat away from Republicans might be just the kind of “partisan gerrymander” that the Supreme Court could now be ready to rule unconstitutional. But would that clarify anything about how much partisanship in drawing new election maps is too much? That is… Read More
State judge denies legal immunity for President
Answering a constitutional question that the Supreme Court left open nearly 21 years ago in a case against President Bill Clinton, a state trial judge in New York ruled Tuesday that President Trump does not have immunity to being sued in state court on claims related to sexual misconduct that did not involve official acts…. Read More
Pennsylvania congressional vote dispute now over?
In the space of about three hours on Monday, the intense, months-long battle over partisan gerrymandering in Pennsylvania elections this year for 18 members of the U.S. House of Representatives reached a pause, one that may well end it altogether. A brief ruling by the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., and a 24-page decision by… Read More